We can learn many important lessons about how the supply of money and banking practices have shaped our societies by studying the events between the time of the American independence, the civil war, the financial crash, the Great Depression, the creation of the federal reserve, and the modern times in which commercial and investment banks move “smart” money and financial instruments at lightning speeds. What it reveals is that worse than inflation and deflation of unpegged money supply, we have created a very commoditized, marginalized, consumptive society and class divides not seen since Dickinson’s plot of ‘Hard Times’. If religion was the opium of the poor, unchecked credit is the opium of the rich.
There was a period in early American history, 1836 – 1863, called the ‘free banking era’ during which there was neither a Central Bank or a Banking Charter, and it occurred during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. The thirty years of laissez-faire witnessed many bank failures and forlorn owners of banknotes unable to redeem their prized notes for the promised amount of gold or silver coins.
The First Bank of the United States, a vision of Alexander Hamilton, received its Charter in 1791 and continued to operate as a majority privately-owned enterprise until 1811. Unlike state banks it was able to open branches across states and issue its own notes and was a vehicle to collect federal tax receipts, accepting only its own currency as payment as opposed to the state banks’ currency. Though it was run profitably, Jeffersonian republicans and critics argued that it was too frugal and favored aristocracy and foreign interests and so its charter was not renewed. The building and all the furniture were purchased by a Philadelphia merchant Stephen Girard who found his own Girard Bank at the same address in South Third Street.
The Second Bank was formed in 1816 and it too ended operations in 1836 under clouds of controversy followed by a thirty-year hiatus known as the ‘free banking era’ in which state banks operated under state rules.
Alexander Hamilton wanted to expand federal fiscal and monetary powers and a central mint funded by excise taxes on whiskey. He wanted to do away with the Continental Congress’s currency which was not backed by gold or silver and had no control over it to check printing of notes. As a federalist, he desired the central government to assume the embryonic nation’s war debts and raise taxes, and have a common national currency. He understood that by doing so, the nation’s bank could benefit from credit from within and outside the territories of the new nation.